Sunday 11 November 2012

City of God

"What should have been swift revenge turned into an all out war. The City of God was divided."

2002
Director: Fernando Meirelles
Writer: Bráulio Mantovani (screenplay), Paolo Lins (novel)
Cast: Alexandre Rodrigues, Matheus Nachtergaele, Leandro Firmino

How fortuitous that my DVD player rejected Snatch last night because it lead me to this gem; a trodden upon, blood-stained gem may I add.

In the amidst of youth violence in a São Paola suburb, Cidade de Deus, one child becomes a drug dealer, killing machine and leader of the slum whereas another is an aspiring photographer.

Right from the onset, even if I did wince at the chicken meat preparation, the film is fast-paced, exciting and despite harrowing violence, I couldn't take my eyes off it. It is frighteningly realistic thanks to young talent being scouted from real Rio slums, many of whom improvised the dialogue, and its true nature makes it even more shocking to see young children killing. The good nature of our narrator Rocket, though, makes you compelled to discover his fate.

The film's narrative control is superb, with Rockett taking us through various characters' stories with the use of flashbacks and forwards though the story stays focused and progressive.

Its editing is another highlight with some of the most inventive uses I have seen: sharpening of knifes which start the film and act as a framing device; Li'l Dice growing up to Li'l Z through low-angle shots of him pointing a gun; freeze frames as we are introduced to "the tender trio". Such skills earned the first-time director various Oscar nods including Best Director itself, Editing and Cinematography (the chaos following a gun-shot during Benny's farewell party being a high point) and a BAFTA win for the editing category.

When the credits rolled, I hadn't been rendered that speechless by a film for a while. City of God is a modern masterpiece.




9/10

Saturday 10 November 2012

The Master


"If you figure out a way to live without a master, any master, be sure to let the rest of us know, for you would be the first in the history of the world." 

2012
Written and directed by Paul Thomas Anderson
Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams

For those of you who have seen Anderson’s previous film, 2007’s brilliant There Will Be Blood, you will most likely recall the 15 minute long dialogue-free opening segment and its captivating portrayal of Daniel Plainview’s life. Jump forward five years and Anderson’s highly-anticipated The Master catches you in just the same way. Instead of down a well, though, we start on an exotic island where World War Two Naval Forces are located and we henceforth gain a intriguing insight into the lives of struggling veterans retuning from service. 

The film initially drew attention due to its supposed depiction of the origins of Scientology. Speaking to CBS, Anderson noted that the film was “loosely inspired by Hubbard” (the church’s founder) and he showed the film to friend and famous Scientologist Tom Cruise (Magnolia, 1999) before its release. This, however, should not be the key talking point of the film but its characters, ideas and ambivalent ending.

Joaquin Phoenix plays the impetuous Freddie Quell, who, psychologically damaged from his experiences, drunkenly saunters from job to job, conjuring up alcoholic potions on his way and attempting to fulfil his sexual longings. He then stumbles upon Lancaster Dodd (Hoffman) , a.k.a The Master, who takes Quell under his wing in the attempt to “cure”  him through his leadership of “The Cause”. 

More of a character study than a plot-driven film ("We're low on story, we're high on character" says Anderson himself), Phoenix and Hoffman’s roles are fascinating and their performances are nothing short of spectacular. Phoenix may play his usual temperamental character but he is so convincing and often funny that scenes without him feel empty. Many are putting Hoffman on the pedestal and he will undoubtedly garner an Oscar nomination, yet I find Phoenix to be equally, if not more, impressive. The leads compliment each other perfectly with the processing scene being their most engaging encounter and hitting the peak of Phoenix's performance. Amy Adams is also a great addition to the cast as she shows Peggy's influence over the seemingly all powerful Master.

Shot in 70mm (highly recommended to see it in this format if you fancy a trip to the Odeon West End), the film is visually breathtaking on the big screen. Dazzling images of the sea contrast with intense close-ups of our characters, accompanied with a subtle and intriguing wood-based score from Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood.

The film is not for everybody though (including my mother who wasn't the best person to take). It’s often challenging in nature by a lack of progressive story line and conclusive end. As Anderson points out, the characters "start the same, and they end the same", which can be quite frustrating for some viewers. 

In my opinion, its only downfall is its ending. Whereas There Will Be Blood’s finale was explosive, shocking and utterly brilliant (“I’m finished” being Daniel Plainview’s final on-screen utterance), The Master fizzles out. At 140 odd minutes, the film is quite long but that would not have been an issue had the intriguing sequences been sustained throughout.  It is testimony to Anderson’s skill, however, that it still remains one of the year’s best films. 

An Oscar front runner? 

As will become apparent over the next few months, I absolutely love Award Season. With a nation-wide UK release of mid-November, The Master is one of the first films to enter the Oscar-sphere, most likely on the part of producer Harvey Weinstein.

Anderson is clearly an actor's director as the majority of his films have garnered Oscar nominations for some of its stars and this will not be an exception. Phoenix are Hoffman are sure to get nods for Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor respectively and I would personally love to see Phoenix take away a statuette.

However, is the film itself too unconventional for the Academy?

The latest trailer for Spielberg’s Lincoln, starring Daniel Day-Lewis (who shone in PTA’s last) in the title role, seems a more traditional historical epic that will likely please the Academy the same way that The King’s Speech did; an iconic leader overcoming his difficulties to fulfil righteous acts, blah blah. There Will Be Blood missed out on the 2008 Best Picture to the Coen Brothers’ dark No Country For Old Men¸ and though equally impressive was undoubtedly less adventurous than Anderson’s offering. Life of Pi, Cloud Atlas and The Hobbit seem to be others discussed as Oscar front runners, all of which won't come as a surprise. 

Though the performances are strong, the characters do fail to reach any enlightening conclusion and none are particularly honourable, aspects that may alienate some voters. Hopefully, though, they will honour the individual, creative film-making of Anderson that escapes Hollywood confines to give a thought-provoking piece of cinema.

No matter how it performs in Award Season, The Master is definitely one of my favourite films of the year and I still cannot stop thinking about it.

9/10 

Thursday 1 November 2012

Skyfall


2012
Director: Sam Mendes
Writers: Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, John Logan
Cast: Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Javier Bardem

I will admit that I'm not the biggest James Bond fan. I've seen a handful of the films and particularly enjoyed Casino Royale but am definitely not a Bond, let's quote all the villains and name all the cars, buff. I hadn't been particularly excited about the Skyfall release until I saw the trailer ("Javier Bardem is in it?!") and started to hear some rave reviews. Therefore, I decided to embrace the Bond hype by booking tickets for opening night, sitting in a packed cinema and revelling at the sight of Skyfall.

The film got off to a brilliant start with a thrilling chase that quickly set the plot into motion. Though not the biggest Adele fan, her bond theme worked very well within the opening credits which, though not as visually intriguing as Casino Royale's, fitted well with the film's themes.

With regards to the cast, I've always liked Craig's portrayal of 007 so no particular surprises there. Dench is great as usual as M, who gets a deservedly bigger role this time which seemingly explains the lack of a strong Bond Girl presence. The young Q (Whishaw) was a good addition, but I found Eve (Harris) to be rather annoying. It is Javier Bardem, though, as Raoul Silva who is the star of the show and the film simply would not be as good without him. He enters the screen in a brilliant fashion, albeit a tardy appearance, and has an overriding presence in each scene, with his personal attachment to M being particularly interesting. His only fault for me is a slight lack of originality. Through no fault of his own, his detention in a circular prison was strongly reminiscent of the iconic Hannibal Lecter scene and one could not help but be reminded of the Joker as Silva takes on a policeman's appearance and brings a humorous edge to the character. This is not to say that Bardem does not deliver a brilliant performance and his acting prowess is proven as he successfully plays a lighter villain to that of the terrifying Anton Chigurh whom he portrayed in No Country for Old Men.

The cinematography was superb and particularly beautiful with the shots of flaming oranges and yellows in the film's concluding sequences. Such visuals and intelligent camerawork, again I must make reference to Silva's arrival, brought a much needed cinematic edge to the franchise rather than simply being a big action-packed adventure film. Its subtle touches of humour were well placed throughout the story and the pacing was almost always appropriate.

With the final scenes referencing the classic Bonds, I think it is about time I watched the earlier films. Goldfinger is already ticked off the list and hopefully many more will be too; maybe they will make a Bond convert out of me yet.

8/10